1996-07-22 - Re: A Snake-Oil FAQ

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3d4c61c2ad4ea0952e6860b73c9c1828f3e2177a04bd8a568c97bc1bd274a958
Message ID: <v02120d11ae197540758e@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-22 22:12:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 06:12:13 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 06:12:13 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: A Snake-Oil FAQ
Message-ID: <v02120d11ae197540758e@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 16:05 7/21/96, Simon Spero wrote:

>Really? The only way I know of forcing a one-time pad is to use a hardware
>QM-based random number generator to generate every possible decrypt, thus
>creating a number of universes equal to the number of possible keys. Since
>you can't tell if you're universe is the right one, one should always
>verify the information obtained against a second source. IANAL, so I can't
>say if such a decrypt would count as probably cause.

Now here is a thought. Since there exists a key that allows you to decrypt
any OTP encrypted message to an arbitrary text of the same length as the
original message, an LEO could work backwards from a given text. "Yes, your
honor. We decrypted the suspects communications and discovered the
following confession." Scary thought.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November.
   Vote Harry Browne for President.







Thread