From: Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rsc.anu.edu.au>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4951ef801fa63d81847ac25c5644314023576f4cd360621efede3b35d63ab727
Message ID: <199607130349.UAA15303@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-13 08:49:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 16:49:37 +0800
From: Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rsc.anu.edu.au>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 16:49:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: EFA attitude to crypto
Message-ID: <199607130349.UAA15303@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Just to clear up Rich Grave's comment regarding the Electronic
Frontiers Australia's attitude to crypto.
EFA did not object the the ABA's report and it's comment about
crypto. They did object to an earlier government report which
said that crypto should be *mandatory* - since turning people
into criminals for transmitting plaintext is just as daft as
turning them into criminals for transmitting encrypted text.
Hope this puts things straight.
Sherry
Return to July 1996
Return to “Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rsc.anu.edu.au>”
1996-07-13 (Sat, 13 Jul 1996 16:49:37 +0800) - EFA attitude to crypto - Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rsc.anu.edu.au>