From: “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
To: “‘Cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 4e7f72914959da28803f6e69621725a5ff4331b662438ddc9214d71eaeb337bf
Message ID: <01BB79AB.20FDE7E0@geeman.vip.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-25 06:42:41 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 14:42:41 +0800
From: "geeman@best.com" <geeman@best.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 14:42:41 +0800
To: "'Cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: FW: Distributed DES crack
Message-ID: <01BB79AB.20FDE7E0@geeman.vip.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
----------
From: Remo Pini[SMTP:rp@rpini.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 1996 7:34 AM
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Distributed DES crack
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Wed Jul 24 16:31:44 1996
Has anyone thought about TI or Motorolas DSP-Eval-Boards (at 99$ a piece at
40 MHz with optimized assembler they might easily outrun a PPro200)
Don't look at me that way, I know only little about DSP-Programming.
>>> DSP's are optimized for add/multiply ... and you get their
memory-access pipelining; but I am not too sure how they'd do on a DES
algo. I wouldn't get too excited.
Return to July 1996
Return to ““geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>”
1996-07-25 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 14:42:41 +0800) - FW: Distributed DES crack - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>