From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 4f5dc954cb89cab83beecb3e6b15d2c08ddc93494a4a0fbb36340e4fa5a35d87
Message ID: <31F55A79.3174@netscape.com>
Reply To: <v02120d21ae1aa90b967e@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-24 10:00:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:00:00 +0800
From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:00:00 +0800
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Netscape
In-Reply-To: <v02120d21ae1aa90b967e@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <31F55A79.3174@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lucky Green wrote:
>
> At 1:23 7/23/96, Jeff Weinstein wrote:
>
> > If you know that the recipient can read a message encrypted with
> >3DES, IDEA, or RC2-128, then you can send the message using one of
> >these strong algorithms. Given that you need someones public key
> >to send them a message, there are several obvious ways to transmit
> >information about what algorithms they accept along with it.
>
> Granted. What about the signature bug? Will Netscape encrypt the outside
> signature?
I think that this bug in s/mime should have been fixed long ago.
We will try to get this fixed in the spec before our products
goes out.
--Jeff
--
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.
Return to July 1996
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”