From: eli+@gs160.sp.cs.cmu.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 533207690fed7ab19f4dcec83c22e0325be799728cfbd1bed8815fabf7738c36
Message ID: <199607292005.NAA08697@toad.com>
Reply To: <+cmu.andrew.internet.cypherpunks+olybBWW00UfAA10EF9@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-29 23:33:56 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 07:33:56 +0800
From: eli+@gs160.sp.cs.cmu.edu
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 07:33:56 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Soft Targets" as Schelling Points
In-Reply-To: <+cmu.andrew.internet.cypherpunks+olybBWW00UfAA10EF9@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <199607292005.NAA08697@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim May writes:
>The connection should be clear, but in case it is not: many soft targets
>are Schelling points for terrorist actions.
I see no coordination problem here. Schelling points are a useful
concept when you have several actors, each of whom benefits from
making the same choice as the others. Here, I think you want to say
"soft targets are easy to attack".
--
Eli Brandt
eli+@cs.cmu.edu
Return to July 1996
Return to “eli+@gs160.sp.cs.cmu.edu”
Unknown thread root