From: Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 09:54:47 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Parsing JYA; now others?
Message-ID: <199607292236.SAA31701@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Say, Duncan - you can do John Young, but can you make any sense of this?

>From: doghead@psyclone.com (Blowjob Jesus)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc,news.admin.misc
Subject: Re: ! Blacklist Spammers and Rogue ISP's !!!!!!!!!!
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 01:08:56 GMT
Organization: The Mighty Psyclone - Gonna Blow Yer Mind
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <31f6c6d2.439333@news.alpha.net>
References: <4t59aq$3n0@park.interport.net>
Reply-To: doghead@psyclone.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.46.104.253
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/32.227

On Wed, 24 Jul 96 13:41:28 GMT, tonyb(remove this garbage to email
me)@interport.net (tony brower) wrote:

>Conventional response to spam is completely ineffective.

Farflung was the offense, easy is the time spent drinking salad
dressing.  Christian Dior, well-known parking ticket, adds his pickle
fork.

>Nothing currently prevents the abuser from getting another account in
>another name and continuing the practise.

Wendigo spake in gruff pebbles, like unto a Timex!  Reginald Denny
left the room with scanners on full auto.

>Even ISP's spam their adverts across newsgroups.

Freedom, paged in 4k chunks, permeates UDP.  There never was a
governor.  The double nickle blowed up good.

>Why can't people who spam and otherwise abuse Usenet for commercial purposes
>be blacklisted?

Approved for your convenience, in sterile jello molds.  The Lawnboy
nods assent.

>e.g. after first warning, no more accounts allowed from that Credit Card or
>other payment source.

The sun, a gaseous ball of tomato paste and model trains, is lost

among clouds of thankfullness.

>Why can't providers who refuse to curtail abuse from their customers also be
>blacklisted and shut out from the net?
>e.g. If ISP's are held responsible for abuse by their customers they'll
>enforce nettiquette ("abide by the rules or lose your account here and
>anywhere for one year").  Irresponsible ISP's will lose customers to those
>ISP's who care.  Hell, let them make their own net for cycling and recylcing
>commercial, make money fast and sex #'s posts.

OJ Simpson skirvined the net and was clarified.  When failed and not
sanguine, there was no response to the 'sturm und drang.'

>Isn't this the fastest way to clean out all the junk that has permeated the
>newsgroups posted by inconsiderate, greedy assholes (who have NOTHING to fear
>by conventional response)?

Response time is minimal.  Lost among oceans of billiard balls made of
styrofoam - tiny marmots build complicated nests of velveeta.

Regroup?

--