1996-07-03 - Re: FTS2000 and Encryption?

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Message Hash: 581490d8f4b7c36da64c8d4edc4672fdac12a0be6c5cc6b5f69e9c48fcbfac7c
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960702220420.2420D-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <199606302206.SAA01870@nrk.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-03 06:13:19 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 14:13:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 14:13:19 +0800
To: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Subject: Re: FTS2000 and Encryption?
In-Reply-To: <199606302206.SAA01870@nrk.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960702220420.2420D-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Sun, 30 Jun 1996, David Lesher wrote:

> > I imagine that we'll see contining developments in the STU-III area (the
> > most popular crypto phone in Government use), as well as new devices
> > supporting Type I and Type II crypto for use on the FTS2000 nets.
> 
> I've heard an ISDN STU-III is either out or coming RSN.

I have an AT&T prototype.  I don't know if they are freely available yet.

> 
> One bugaboo I recall was that FTS2000 would not let us make a frac
> T1 off-net connection. Alas, that included the remote diagnostic
> number of the equip. mfgr ;-{
> 
> -- 
> A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
> & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
> Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
> is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
> 






Thread