1996-07-20 - Re: Filtering out Queers is OK

Header Data

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 60dfb37c3117653eb498044db025698f49b723b0d950b7ba1ad94723cfc812b8
Message ID: <ae1510250b021004cc14@[205.199.118.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-20 01:42:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 09:42:45 +0800

Raw message

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 09:42:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Filtering out Queers is OK
Message-ID: <ae1510250b021004cc14@[205.199.118.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 3:45 PM 7/19/96, Troy Denkinger wrote:

>We have an interesting problem here, though.  You say that the government
>has no right to tell you how to set your filter; no doubt about that, imo.
>However, most people who use these filters are going to be quite happy to
>allow some corporate entity the privilege of setting their filters for them
>and, if the consumer should ask about criteria and such, they are told that
>that's a trade secret.  So, people will be allowing a corporate entity that

And? After all, when Coca Cola offers only one formula for Coke (these
days, at least) and yet keeps the formula a treade secret, is this not
similiarly restrictive of "choice"? The fact is that consumers never have
full freedom about what other agents or companies offer to trade to them.


>exists for profit to set their filters for them.  This is a very scary thing
>and perhaps even more frightening than having the government do it.  I think
>that the people on this list tend to maintain a healthy scepticism toward
>the various TLAs, but we have to remember that a large, multinational
>corporation has not even got a sense of a greater "national good" or even
>"national security" to guide it.

Magazines, newspapers, and other such sources routinely make editorial
decisions about what to cover. And no, they do not necessarily publicize
the inner workings of their editorial process.

Are we to be "scared" that "Newsweek," for example, has their own filters
and is a multinational corporation (gulp)? "Newsweek" has many secrets of
their own; the most recent being that their own Joe Klein was the author of
the anonymous novel "Primary Colors," and the publisher knew it.

People and companies have their own agendas, their own filters, and their
own reasons for doing things they do. Get used to it.

--Tim May

Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist         | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."









Thread