1996-07-03 - Re: Lack of PGP signatures

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: bshantz@nwlink.com
Message Hash: 6c68d8fe4a7ad21488e7409adcd42054995b4bb20207eac74d4943b1b7a846fc
Message ID: <199607031509.LAA09556@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199607031436.HAA27482@montana.nwlink.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-03 19:44:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 03:44:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 03:44:48 +0800
To: bshantz@nwlink.com
Subject: Re: Lack of PGP signatures
In-Reply-To: <199607031436.HAA27482@montana.nwlink.com>
Message-ID: <199607031509.LAA09556@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I'm sure Derek and the other guys on PGPlib will make it easier to
> integrate into applications.  Am I just blowing smoke, Mr. Atkins?

No, you are not blowing smoke.  That is the hope of the PGPlib
project; PGPlib will make it easy (almost trivial) to integrate PGP
security into almost any application.

> In my free time, I have been playing around with add ons for 
> Microsoft Exchange.  I've got an OLE 2.0 encryption object that 
> embeds nicely into an Exchange message.  I haven't tied it in to PGP 
> yet, because I have been waiting for the release of PGPlib.  However, 
> that will allow at least some seamless integration.

Neat.  I don't know enough about OLE to comment, but can we discuss
this offline?  Is there an equivalent of OLE (AppleEvents, perhaps?)
for the Mac?  It would be really cool if we could come up with a
plug-in standard that gets put into mailers such that we could later
add a PGP drop-in that performs the encryption using those standard
interfaces.

-derek





Thread