From: Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>
To: Arun Mehta <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7914ae0324ea1b7d03808d163d7e35960e623cce42e0f8c0f11366f0eb0d3a16
Message ID: <96Jul18.115805edt.20483@janus.algorithmics.com>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19960718150222.0030bf9c@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 20:42:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 04:42:17 +0800
From: Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 04:42:17 +0800
To: Arun Mehta <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: PGPfone Beta 7 Now Available for Download
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960718150222.0030bf9c@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
Message-ID: <96Jul18.115805edt.20483@janus.algorithmics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>>>>> In article <1.5.4.32.19960718150222.0030bf9c@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>, Arun Mehta <amehta@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in> writes:
> In response to my question about how I might use PGPfone without my ISP knowing,
> At 10:52 16/07/96 -0400, Robin Powell wrote:
>>
>> Hmm... This looks like a _really_ good place for stego. Granted, you
>> might get a significant slow down, but it might be worth it depending
>> on your needs.
> Wouldn't that be very, very slow? It would suffice if I could
> have the ISP think that the packets were for irc, or something
> else they allow...
I actually wasn't reffering to your particular situation so much as a
general comment. Having a game of nettrek with encrypted voice in the
unused packets would be _very_ secure, I should think...
-Robin
Return to July 1996
Return to “Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>”
Unknown thread root