From: “David F. Ogren” <ogren@cris.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7bdecdc56151c3a75115e0ccfa289b43b02507139af218e17dc6d8d359efbb9a
Message ID: <199607030350.XAA21619@darius.cris.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-03 07:18:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:18:36 +0800
From: "David F. Ogren" <ogren@cris.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:18:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Lack of PGP signatures
Message-ID: <199607030350.XAA21619@darius.cris.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Tue Jul 02 23:47:42 1996
<snip>
> This is one reason. I think that there are several other reasons:
>
> -- Someone may be using a machine at work or on a multiuser UNIX system
> which
> is untrusted and insecure. In the case of a UNIX account, one
> could
> compose a message off-line and rz it using a term program, but that
> is a
> major hassle.
>
From the responses I received, this one may be a biggie. And it's one that
we can't do much about remedying.
<snip>
> > Is it because most mail programs are not PGP aware?
>
> I don't know of any mail programs that can use PGP (I know there are
> various
> interfaces, sendmail wrappers, and other hacks, but I have yet to see a
> mailer
> with an "Encrypt" or "Sign" option.
>
I'm beta testing a PGP aware mailer right now called Pronto Secure. It
will be a great program when its release. Requires almost no PGP
knowledge. Everything is almost perfectly transparent to the user.
There is also Private Idado, of course, but that's a little harder to use,
and doesn't have the features of a full-fledged mailer.
I figure that if strong encryption becomes legal to export from the US
(making international standards easier to implement), we may see more
programs like these.
David F. Ogren |
ogren@concentric.net | "A man without religion is like a fish
PGP Key ID: 0x6458EB29 | without a bicycle"
- ------------------------------|----------------------------------------
Don't know what PGP is? | Need my public key? It's available
Send a message to me with the | by server or by sending me a message
subject GETPGPINFO | with the subject GETPGPKEY
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBMdntX+SLhCBkWOspAQGNgAf/VD/h7sVi/lhIJHSZMtJ262TIE7l++nRh
igjbX3PQeIIWrkWuilqarpuYMPwmOXB1OTn38MGkiwGENpAjsX7dS7+kyv/uh5IH
OY250DUMdiVW8YqYRknXo2lnOQDxtBWxO/aoDdJoFMRYHYaIBQGtAeg4WpbTjK19
OwdhtDSoXtY8EqdJJHctJcN1Ds7crJWI1v6vmR/I3AhvHMZZrmMuv1Dczsyn3aTj
P+wqspkp1oXztRQwP4VCEDpd7X2RGI74fICuJcf0+lRFoIH1o/gI50zLca+b/nq4
I3gn8Vo+LdUzmVpWNkrbW3YhMPyaIIYxFQ36BBT1A/KqliUvZooUgA==
=l17m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1996
Return to ““David F. Ogren” <ogren@cris.com>”
1996-07-03 (Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:18:36 +0800) - Re: Lack of PGP signatures - “David F. Ogren” <ogren@cris.com>