1996-07-13 - Re: Can’t block caller ID in Massachusetts?

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: Eric Murray <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu (David Mazieres)
Message Hash: 8270ddb57859da16d31df86543da87d219e76a1c6437e312a1bfa93821df0c93
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960712234433.0082448c@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-13 04:43:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 12:43:29 +0800

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 12:43:29 +0800
To: Eric Murray <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu (David Mazieres)
Subject: Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960712234433.0082448c@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:54 AM 7/12/96 -0700, Eric Murray wrote:
>When I called the Pac Bell customer service droids to get my "complete"
>blocking I asked them why they won't block CID to 800 numbers.
>Their answer: "that's just the way it works". 

Since they can't bill you for LD numbers you call without reporting the
calls on your bill, they can't charge 800 (or pay 900) number owners without
reporting which numbers called them.

I suppose you could just trust them (like the UK) and not demand a list of
numbers you called and then the 800/900 businesses might do the same.  Likely?

DCF






Thread