1996-07-14 - Correction Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used . . .

Header Data

From: “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 83a40befd5697173335dbb7241cbabc09525f8c210a4f863518814e05a143a67
Message ID: <199607141249.IAA15965@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Reply To: <199607131808.OAA10339@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-14 16:05:37 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 00:05:37 +0800

Raw message

From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 00:05:37 +0800
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Correction Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used . . .
In-Reply-To: <199607131808.OAA10339@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
Message-ID: <199607141249.IAA15965@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I wrote:

: : The ITAR do NOT apply to books.
: 
: The only trouble with this claim is that it does not conform to the
: language of the ITAR or with the whimsical practices of the Office of
: Defense Trade Controls.  There is no exception for books, except for
: those that are in the public domain because they are sold in book stores
: and at newstands or are found in libraries, and the ODT insists that one
: cannot put a book into the public domain by putting it into the public
: domain or by selling it in a bookstore.

Whereas I meant to say:

: cannot put a book into the public domain by putting it into _a 
: library_ or by selling it in a bookstore.

I hope that this did not cause any confusion.

--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
Internet:  junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu    junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu





Thread