From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Michael Froomkin <markm@voicenet.com>
Message Hash: 8b99f2d4c88f97dcb3bf3e625753f06ba7f0a497e5762fbf5cbfd3764e9c37d6
Message ID: <199607130624.XAA24879@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-13 10:58:21 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 18:58:21 +0800
From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 18:58:21 +0800
To: Michael Froomkin <markm@voicenet.com>
Subject: Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?
Message-ID: <199607130624.XAA24879@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 9:21 PM 7/12/96 -0400, Michael Froomkin wrote:
>> could claim that MIT came very close to violating ITAR, but the same claim
>
>"The ITAR do not apply to books"
I'm not sure the exact legalities apply here. I think it is more like the
mob pressuring business men for protection and punishing those who do not
comply.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The Internet may fairly be | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | regarded as a never-ending | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | worldwide conversation. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to July 1996
Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
1996-07-13 (Sat, 13 Jul 1996 18:58:21 +0800) - Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR? - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)