From: mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95b33c934e3595979d18bd95b44fa6ff37e44062357479d3d300545d5ea8c141
Message ID: <199607252246.PAA11703@fionn.lbl.gov>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 03:12:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:12:11 +0800
From: mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:12:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CD Prices and Inflation
Message-ID: <199607252246.PAA11703@fionn.lbl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Jul 26, 5:06am, Timothy C. May wrote:
> Something not being talked about in any of the messages I've seen is the
> role of _inflation_. Those claiming CD prices are "too high" should
> consider inflation.
Good argument, but I think you're still paying more.
Some have made the argument that the cost of manufacture
of a CD is less (I wouldn't know). Most people pay considerably
more taxes for that new platter, too. Sales tax is 6% or more now,
was 2-3% then for most people, other taxes have gone way up too. You
probably had to earn $28 to bring home that $16 cd.
Return to July 1996
Return to “mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)”
1996-07-26 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 11:12:11 +0800) - Re: CD Prices and Inflation - mike@fionn.lbl.gov (Michael Helm)