From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9e7052a784416c98369ab40c97224cd371c8867b53c98448be15ecfb6f9c2cec
Message ID: <199607260642.XAA14728@netcom23.netcom.com>
Reply To: <21a.193396.40@iac-online.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 11:34:35 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 19:34:35 +0800
From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 19:34:35 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: IP: NSA RESPONSE TO KEY LENGTH REPORT
In-Reply-To: <21a.193396.40@iac-online.com>
Message-ID: <199607260642.XAA14728@netcom23.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com> writes:
> Finally, the NSA report offers estimates of the time
> required to perform exhaustive search using a Cray model T3D
> supercomputer. This is a curious choice, for as our report
> notes, general-purpose supercomputers of this type make poor
> (and uneconomical) key search engines.
A tiny nit to pick here. The Cray T3D and T3E computers are
massively parallel machines consisting of DEC Alpha chips hooked
up in a 3D Torus configuration. They would probably make pretty
decent key search engines, as opposed to the general purpose
vector supercomputers Cray is better known for.
> Table 3 are out estimates based on our experience with a
> Cray T3D supercomputer with 1024 nodes. This machine costs
> $30 million.
> [Tables 1, 2, and 3 not transcribed here.]
You left out the most interesting part!
--
Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $
Return to July 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”