1996-07-26 - Re: IP: NSA RESPONSE TO KEY LENGTH REPORT

Header Data

From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9e7052a784416c98369ab40c97224cd371c8867b53c98448be15ecfb6f9c2cec
Message ID: <199607260642.XAA14728@netcom23.netcom.com>
Reply To: <21a.193396.40@iac-online.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 11:34:35 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 19:34:35 +0800

Raw message

From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 19:34:35 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: IP: NSA RESPONSE TO KEY LENGTH REPORT
In-Reply-To: <21a.193396.40@iac-online.com>
Message-ID: <199607260642.XAA14728@netcom23.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com> writes:

 > Finally, the NSA report offers estimates of the time
 > required to perform exhaustive search using a Cray model T3D
 > supercomputer.  This is a curious choice, for as our report
 > notes, general-purpose supercomputers of this type make poor
 > (and uneconomical) key search engines.

A tiny nit to pick here.  The Cray T3D and T3E computers are
massively parallel machines consisting of DEC Alpha chips hooked
up in a 3D Torus configuration.  They would probably make pretty
decent key search engines, as opposed to the general purpose
vector supercomputers Cray is better known for.

 > Table 3 are out estimates based on our experience with a
 > Cray T3D supercomputer with 1024 nodes.  This machine costs
 > $30 million.

 > [Tables 1, 2, and 3 not transcribed here.]

You left out the most interesting part!

--
     Mike Duvos         $    PGP 2.6 Public Key available     $
     mpd@netcom.com     $    via Finger.                      $






Thread