1996-07-20 - Re: Filtering out Queers is OK

Header Data

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
To: Troy Denkinger <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a1367fff5be7bdca9be2f18a928f8ae16dc9d6efceedf3f4a72d01e7d30f0de1
Message ID: <v03007613ae15b757c962@[192.187.162.15]>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960719154550.0073d960@popd.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-20 14:42:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 22:42:20 +0800

Raw message

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 22:42:20 +0800
To: Troy Denkinger <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Filtering out Queers is OK
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960719154550.0073d960@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <v03007613ae15b757c962@[192.187.162.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 8:45 AM -0700 7/19/96, Troy Denkinger wrote:

>However, most people who use these filters are going to be quite happy to
>allow some corporate entity the privilege of setting their filters for them
>and, if the consumer should ask about criteria and such, they are told that
>that's a trade secret.  So, people will be allowing a corporate entity that
>exists for profit to set their filters for them.  This is a very scary thing
>and perhaps even more frightening than having the government do it.

Not so fast, D'Artagnan. Let's deconstruct your statement that it's a scary
thing:

1. Is it scary to the people who buy and use it? Apparently not, since they
hae free choice.

2. Is your finding it scary relevant? Apparently not, since you don't have
to buy it and thus have free choice.

What's left except authoritarianism on your part?

David







Thread