From: “Alex F” <alexf@iss.net>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: bb2b9f326808c5bd2d149ab9a1c4cec6b2c4b470f00c116c592ec9e4b4bb5c37
Message ID: <199607251447.KAA02494@phoenix.iss.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-25 18:14:58 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 02:14:58 +0800
From: "Alex F" <alexf@iss.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 02:14:58 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic)
Message-ID: <199607251447.KAA02494@phoenix.iss.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> >>Isn't it odd that when music is sold, CD's are MORE expensive than cassette
> >>tapes, even though you _know_ that the manufacturing cost of CD's is less?
> >
> >CDs sell for more because buyers decided that they wanted a wider range of
> >titles with shallower sales (hence higher unit costs) rather than a narrower
> I'm afraid that quantitatively, this is utter nonsense.
>
> A relevant data point is the fact that for about $1000, anybody can have
> 1000 copies of a custom CDROM manufactured. That, by music industry
The real; answer to all of these points is too simple.
"Because they can"
A lot has to do with percieved value. If consumers would have
thought that the prices were way too high, then the market would have
dictated a lower cost eventually. I think that the price of CDs vs
tapes is more a marketing issue than a technical one....
Alex F
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Alex F alexf@iss.net
Marketing Specialist
Internet Security Systems
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Return to July 1996
Return to ““Alex F” <alexf@iss.net>”
1996-07-25 (Fri, 26 Jul 1996 02:14:58 +0800) - Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic) - “Alex F” <alexf@iss.net>