1996-07-16 - Re: Clueless “Attachment converted” uses

Header Data

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
To: Simon Spero <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: c13174c9f212152f8446c62136791650379f818949815decdedd0ab8ad78f708
Message ID: <v03007604ae10503d28f6@[192.187.162.15]>
Reply To: <ae0f1d14030210043edc@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-16 04:24:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 12:24:41 +0800

Raw message

From: David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 12:24:41 +0800
To: Simon Spero <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Clueless "Attachment converted" uses
In-Reply-To: <ae0f1d14030210043edc@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <v03007604ae10503d28f6@[192.187.162.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 6:01 AM -0700 7/15/96, Simon Spero wrote:
>On a very similar note - could people who are using clear-text PGP
>signatures with mime use text/... instead of application/...; that way
>people without pgp will see the message text without having to mess with
>their mailcaps (that's the way text/* is supposed to work)

It's kludgy, I agree, but that's the way the example PGP translator for our
mailer that some of us are using works right now. If someone rewrites that
part of it, I'm sure we'd all be happy to switch. Dunno if there's an easy
patch with ResEdit. (It's for the Mac.)

In my own case I used it to clearsign my first few posts here to avoid
somebody popping up and claiming a spoof. I don't plan to do it regularly.

David







Thread