1996-07-24 - Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic)

Header Data

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: c9276b0dcbd8ae0c8021846ae11057c1f25fe8ccecbc194efe30eb14bcc97ac8
Message ID: <31F613B0.446B9B3D@systemics.com>
Reply To: <ae1af49306021004964e@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-24 15:13:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 23:13:02 +0800

Raw message

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 23:13:02 +0800
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic)
In-Reply-To: <ae1af49306021004964e@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <31F613B0.446B9B3D@systemics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Timothy C. May wrote:
 
> Pre-recorded DAT tapes were available for a while...they did not sell. I
> believe this was because DAT machine purchasers were sophisticated and new
> how to make CD-to-DAT copies, with or without SCMS.

Don't forget that pre-recorded DAT tapes are at least an order of
magnitude more expensive to manufacture than CDs. 

Gary
--
pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06





Thread