From: David Rosoff <drosoff@ARC.unm.EDU>
To: Scott Schryvers <hua@chromatic.com>
Message Hash: d48d985cbd1013c23a74bc73d5f320c9e7a0f9c617f99aac35c640600d437fc6
Message ID: <1.5.4.16.19960724164258.0b775f04@arc.unm.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-24 20:38:03 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:38:03 +0800
From: David Rosoff <drosoff@ARC.unm.EDU>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:38:03 +0800
To: Scott Schryvers <hua@chromatic.com>
Subject: Re: Kids and Computer Privacy Was Re: No more stupid gun thread ...
Message-ID: <1.5.4.16.19960724164258.0b775f04@arc.unm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 03.48 AM 7/24/96 -0500, Scott Schryvers wrote:
>Should kids have crypto? [weapons]
Your analogy fails when I consider the simple point that crypto is not
a weapon in and of itself, no matter what the misguided ITAR says.
"... two plus two make five ..."
>Under Itar crypto is a weapon. If a kid were to bring a disk
>containing pgp to school could they be expelled for carrying a weapon?
No, because crypto, *by itself* does NOT present a threat to any other
kid or to any teacher or to the kid carrying the code.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMfZR5hguzHDTdpL5AQHqsgP5AcEWBP0SeGCWwgOKGgDVuzz4yJRXk218
lSepjhxa+OnK6Aw5Gxk/+ykJAZM++VPH4LKR3ztRP5X3CJMC8zJ+f4qatmqzRptU
yKagSL8yF2/xN9ltwJcl6T3F4f88LJKD0vDpp4M+FeIX90zDosxPl0TYYv3niG2u
v2ePUFTwWKI=
=IlGz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1996
Return to “David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>”