1996-07-18 - Re: Washington Post – “Block but Verify”

Header Data

From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: bkmarsh@feist.com>
Message Hash: d4cb52704a302fd895136ade0c364dbe0cce47740acd6a4b0ace5dab80e01c37
Message ID: <clvNcLW00YUq14y_E0@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960717131852.10580A-100000@wichita.fn.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 04:50:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 12:50:07 +0800

Raw message

From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 12:50:07 +0800
To: bkmarsh@feist.com>
Subject: Re: Washington Post -- "Block but Verify"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960717131852.10580A-100000@wichita.fn.net>
Message-ID: <clvNcLW00YUq14y_E0@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 17-Jul-96 Re: Washington Post --
"Blo.. by "Bruce M."@feist.com 
>     I thought that Net Nanny or another related product offered generic 
> options for what you wanted to block.  Such as clicking on an option box 
> to enable the blocking of violence or to enable the blocking of sexual 
> material.

Some products do, some don't. SurfWatch is ON or OFF. CyberPatrol has a
dozen categories.

-Declan







Thread