1996-07-31 - Re: Dry Under the Waterfall

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Message Hash: d4d2c5f917782f13b591c046e4c66a6dc6c6e11b8bb131b5ce23f1cf4329eb76
Message ID: <199607302032.QAA03561@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960730135447.0085571c@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-31 00:32:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 08:32:16 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 08:32:16 +0800
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Subject: Re: Dry Under the Waterfall
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960730135447.0085571c@panix.com>
Message-ID: <199607302032.QAA03561@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Duncan Frissell writes:
> Now, even though the net is more graphical, it still lacks appeal for 95% of
> the population (or at least enough appeal to get them on to it).

Untrue, Duncan. Far more than 5% of the population is online already,
and the numbers are expanding rapidly. Soon even the semi-literate
will be on line, if only so they can get the latest pornography and
sports videos.

I agree, however, with your point that the "information have nots"
aren't going to be helped by any handout program. I have friends who
started out dirt poor using the Net from their fifth floor walkup
apartment in tenements in Hell's Kitchen with ancient used equipment,
and who now have decent jobs paying well over national average doing
-- what else -- net related work. Its entirely a question of personal
motivation.

Perry





Thread