From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Message Hash: d8e206ec920e4e780511d21d8fc5beba0f72473ef1421a527001b3b5202e349d
Message ID: <960723.182444.5Y6.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
Reply To: <199607230317.UAA18923@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-24 05:29:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 13:29:48 +0800
From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 13:29:48 +0800
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Subject: Re: Anonymous web servers
In-Reply-To: <199607230317.UAA18923@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <960723.182444.5Y6.rnr.w165w@sendai.scytale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In list.cypherpunks, hfinney@shell.portal.com writes about anonymous web
pages:
<snip>
> In some ways the role of the "meeting place" software is similar to an
> IRC server. In fact, this concept could be thought of as HTTP over
> IRC.
>
> The big question mark is whether the meeting place would be blamed for
> the possibly illicit transactions it facilitates.
</snip>
I see a big parallel to the remailers. Both are simply conduits.
Remailers have already been attacked for the content they've passed.
HTTP meeting places will surely catch the same kind of heat.
- --
Roy M. Silvernail [ ] roy@scytale.com
PGP Public Key fingerprint = 31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54 13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6
Key available from pubkey@scytale.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMfVgIhvikii9febJAQGH+AP9E9XPMr2XMCYk9wDoYo/4gF4roJ15RyDO
UHQupCaI2+OopQd2utKw4s71DbmRYXkuhQflFjQdZoSaFOaG1xDfI2mwCJjb7TpV
xwJ9OFdAkOD3glgwnNX+xeUjTSzzViDefXR/ykm2eXxXCSfvcbhWZdncemQlDLv+
pKO2aEoOFpw=
=kwZV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1996
Return to “roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)”