From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dc7ab50c668cbe91ebaea05b38711251b51736e2e251c46c1ee749d73eded609
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960719151139.0083afac@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-19 19:11:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 03:11:52 +0800
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 03:11:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: BIG_dif
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960719151139.0083afac@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Because of these concerns, Mondex has been modified in
> the United States so that banks will be able to track
> card use. That will allow them to audit for fraud, if
> not recreate every transaction. Data from Mondex cards
> will be used for various product marketing.
>
> "We believe there should be privacy, but there is a big
> difference between privacy and anonymity," Dudley Nigg,
> executive vice president of Wells Fargo, said.
So, how will the identity of the cardholder be tracked when they are
transferred physically from one person to another?
Presumably bank tracking will only work when the card is submitted to a
"public" terminal. "Wallet" transfers won't be tracked immediately. Also,
if an API is realeased, interesting possibilities are created.
DCF
Return to July 1996
Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
1996-07-19 (Sat, 20 Jul 1996 03:11:52 +0800) - Re: BIG_dif - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>