From: “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
To: “‘pjn@nworks.com>
Message Hash: e241056f4fa99a042ce95ce06486730963986e8327a7c90f27deaf36603bc1a6
Message ID: <01BB7946.4C886760@geeman.vip.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-24 20:17:05 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:17:05 +0800
From: "geeman@best.com" <geeman@best.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:17:05 +0800
To: "'pjn@nworks.com>
Subject: RE: Brute-forcing DES
Message-ID: <01BB7946.4C886760@geeman.vip.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Count me in:
Good reason to get the XT (!!!!!!) and the 12Mhz Vendex286 out of the garage ...
We can throw in the Mac too if the code's portable.
And the 486-100.
And you can have McArthur, the P-133, after bedtime.
And the 486-20 portable, why not?
I'm also available for assembler coding/optimizing on a limited basis.
Excellent project!
On Tue, 23 Jul 1996 pjn@nworks.com wrote:
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 16:25:44 -0500
> From: pjn@nworks.com
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Brute-forcing DES
>
> > Any one up for a distributed brute force attack on single DES? My
> > back-of-the-envelope calculations and guesstimates put this on the
> > hairy edge of doability (the critical factor is how many machines can
> > be recruited - a non-trivial cash prize would help).
>
Return to July 1996
Return to ““geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>”
1996-07-24 (Thu, 25 Jul 1996 04:17:05 +0800) - RE: Brute-forcing DES - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>