From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 16:45:48 +0800
To: CyberEyes <cyberia@cam.org>
Subject: [NOISE] Re: Net and Terrorism.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.94.960705120406.23070B-100000@Stratus.CAM.ORG>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960706001016.1518C-100000@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 5 Jul 1996, CyberEyes wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, snow wrote:
> >      2) When they _are_ exposed, let them fight the fuck back. Rules of 
> >         engagment are simple. When fired on, shoot to kill. If the shot 
> >         comes from a building, take out the building. If from a crowd, 
> >         well, do you best, but _get the shooter_. 
> 	Basically, what you're saying is that one armed person in a crowd
> of a hundred needs to be killed no matter what happens to the lives of the
> other 99? Give me a break, we're not living in the 1800's anymore, we want
> to STOP wars, not create them!

     Tell that to the person on the recieving of the terrorist bullets/
gernades. 

     The idea is have a very simple policy about terrorism/guerilla warfare/
lone kooks shooting shit up. They will be eliminated. No other changes 
will be made. No midnight house to house searchs, no pograms, no
concentration camps, justa  simple rule. You shoot at armed people you will
die (remember this was in the context of terrorist attacks against military
and harder targets). 

     It is done _immediately_ if not sooner. 

     Possibly it would have the side effect that people in a crowd would 
take down the guy next to them that was pulling the gun becasue they 
know what will happen if they don't. 

i
Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@crash.suba.com