1996-07-26 - Re: Twenty Bank Robbers – Game theory:)

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: eli+@gs160.sp.cs.cmu.edu
Message Hash: f39455a6d6acc8e1cbeb0b7af515e78d6ddbd0bfab7658a5c65e0fb0f9349792
Message ID: <199607260435.XAA00384@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <199607260111.SAA11897@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 10:49:34 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 18:49:34 +0800

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 18:49:34 +0800
To: eli+@gs160.sp.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Twenty Bank Robbers -- Game theory:)
In-Reply-To: <199607260111.SAA11897@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199607260435.XAA00384@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


eli+@gs160.sp.cs.cmu.edu wrote:
> 
> Hal Finney writes:
> >I think the best way to approach this problem is to first try to solve
> >it assuming there are only two robbers rather than 20.
> 
> Right.  Of course, you're implicitly assuming not only that this bunch
> of bank robbers is rational, but that they're familiar with
> mathematical induction.  :->

In my initial post that caused all the turmoil I said (literally) this:

``Twenty cypherpunks robbed a bank.''
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I was careful choosing words.

	- Igor.





Thread