From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: Michael Helm <mike@fionn.lbl.gov>
Message Hash: fe4f92a38efa6c1ca351c818221f638c6afee004f937ac3cf3dd79e5a2fae7c8
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960711231117.174E-100000@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <199607111723.KAA29657@fionn.lbl.gov>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-12 10:41:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 18:41:23 +0800
From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 18:41:23 +0800
To: Michael Helm <mike@fionn.lbl.gov>
Subject: Re: "White 'Punks on Dope" (w apologies to The Tubes)
In-Reply-To: <199607111723.KAA29657@fionn.lbl.gov>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960711231117.174E-100000@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 11 Jul 1996, Michael Helm wrote:
> Ritalin or other drugs, their benefits & their costs, but this straw
> man is just ridiculous, & betrays the author's lack of knowledge.
> Unfortunately a similar misunderstanding is reflected in the writings
> of 1 or 2 others on this topic too.
> Parental (or other) control is not at issue at all with add; self
> control is the main problem.
No, the POINT IS MIS-DIAGNOSIS. Children who are either brighter
than their classmates and figured out the assignement with in minutes
of the teacher giving it, or children with _no_ boundries implemented
by their parents (people are like fractals, very subject to initial
conditions) hence they keep pushing and pushing so the parents respond
by instituting chemical control.
Most of the people who are arguing "against" ritilan ADMIT there
are (or might be) some cases where certain chemicals are the way to go,
but we feel that there are FAR to many cases out there.
Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@crash.suba.com
Return to July 1996
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”