1996-08-22 - Re: your mail
Header Data
From: “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
To: Bovine Remailer <haystack@cow.net>
Message Hash: 038d7e717ce07f3abbf7e54d3f02d125c8042a7d25be78441d42785f0cadd1ae
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9608211936.A5488-0100000@netcom17>
Reply To: <9608212250.AA14289@cow.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-22 05:22:36 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13:22:36 +0800
Raw message
From: "Z.B." <zachb@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13:22:36 +0800
To: Bovine Remailer <haystack@cow.net>
Subject: Re: your mail
In-Reply-To: <9608212250.AA14289@cow.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9608211936.A5488-0100000@netcom17>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Uh huh. Sure. I believe nothing more needs to be said about this.
---
Zach Babayco
zachb@netcom.com <----- finger for PGP public key
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/4127
On Wed, 21 Aug 1996, Bovine Remailer wrote:
> The Postal service is working on a new postage method, 2 key signature,
> which will be unique to each "postal unit" ( stamp ) the signature will
> be logged when you buy the stamps....No more anon. snail mail......
>
> Just thought you'd like to know !
>
Thread
Return to August 1996
- Return to “Bovine Remailer <haystack@cow.net>”
- Return to ““Bruce M.” <bkmarsh@feist.com>”
- Return to “ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)”
Return to ““Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>”
- 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:35:31 +0800) - No Subject - Bovine Remailer <haystack@cow.net>
- 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13:20:38 +0800) - Re: your mail - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
- 1996-08-22 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13:22:36 +0800) - Re: your mail - “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
- 1996-08-22 (Fri, 23 Aug 1996 04:57:18 +0800) - Re: USPS - “Bruce M.” <bkmarsh@feist.com>