1996-08-20 - Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11

Header Data

From: qut@netcom.com (Roger Healy OBC)
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Message Hash: 04312068752124cfa0e1abaeda3cb8da126c8972b1a0de721bab151174beaec6
Message ID: <199608200621.XAA18741@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199608200001.RAA02120@netcom8.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-20 08:33:33 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:33:33 +0800

Raw message

From: qut@netcom.com (Roger Healy OBC)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:33:33 +0800
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11
In-Reply-To: <199608200001.RAA02120@netcom8.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199608200621.XAA18741@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


ON
> 
> At  1:34 PM 8/19/96 -0700, Mike Duvos wrote:
> >Permit me to go off in an orthogonal direction here and say that
> >I think that we should do away with the concept of a pre-ordained
> >newsgroups in Usenet entirely, in favor of an IRC-like dynamic 
> >creation of message pools.
> 
> Moderated newsgroups gain reputation from their moderation policies and
> probably should not be included in this scheme.

Moderated newsgroups have very few posts because hardly anyone reads 
them.  I second the above propsed IRC-like scheme if it only would apply 
to moderated groups, because of IRC's bad reputation of moderation.





Thread