1996-08-13 - Re: Stealth Buildings Was Re: “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches

Header Data

From: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
To: schryver@radiks.net
Message Hash: 07ff9d352e30f59018d37533b4390abfd4f08edcfb4e223a56208323ab8e50f3
Message ID: <9608131856.AA05229@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 23:07:49 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 07:07:49 +0800

Raw message

From: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 07:07:49 +0800
To: schryver@radiks.net
Subject: Re: Stealth Buildings Was Re: "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches
Message-ID: <9608131856.AA05229@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



If foil or metal mesh would block it, then many recently built houses
would be already set.  Usually that 1/2 - 1 inch styrofoam used 
on almost all exterior walls has a reflective layer of foil to help
keep the heat/cold out.

Then again, this sounds like hype-ed up infra-red technology
to me, in which case seeing through walls is B.S.

Dan

> 
> At 06:56 PM 8/12/96 EDT, you wrote:
> Since metal blocks the waves and stands out on the screen one could affectively
> block its use by putting up a fine metal mesh on the interior of all walls 
> that are exterior to the house.  The same could be said for clothing that 
> looks normal but has a metal mesh liner, like say a trench coat.
> 
> >	I would wonder if a jamming device (preferably area-effect with a 
> >slowly randomly varying swathe of area, to avoid figuring out who was carrying
> >it) would be possible, or some variety of shielding (i.e., emitting waves
> >looking similar to flesh).
> >	-Allen
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Oelke                                  Alcatel Network Systems
droelke@aud.alcatel.com                             Richardson, TX






Thread