1996-08-11 - Re: Going Postal (Was: Boom!)

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 10bbb697f0ad406c3a23e1edf47e4548f2524b34cfa9349a2cda2fe189de99c7
Message ID: <199608110037.RAA10125@dns1.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-11 06:57:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 14:57:58 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 14:57:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Going Postal (Was: Boom!)
Message-ID: <199608110037.RAA10125@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


(Regarding the one pound limit on anonymous parcels)

At 08:13 AM 8/9/96 -0700, David.K.Merriman@toad.com, wrote:
> Don't know that I'm a 'bomb expert', but it would appear reasonable that 6 
> just-under-a-pound bombs would do approximately as much damage as a 
> similarly sized larger device.

As was pointed out earlier in this thread, a one pound device containing 
high explosive can drop a plane out of the sky as if it was swatting a fly.

Note that any moron can make high explosive, though the average moron 
has a good chance of blowing himself up in the process.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread