From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 05:27:09 +0800
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: [NOISE] "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199608150313.WAA08490@einstein>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960815131921.1400A-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 14 Aug 1996, Jim Choate wrote:

> 
> Forwarded message:
> 
> > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 22:24:39 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
> > Subject: Re: [NOISE] "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches
> > 
> > Correct.  No warrant is required to observe that which is freely collected
> > after eminating from the residence of another and observed off his
> > property.
> > 
> > Same concept applies to the "sniff" test and ariel views into greenhouses.
> 
> Pitty somebody doesn't bring a suite against the FCC under this logic. It
> would particularly impact radar detectors, cell phones, and other types of
> scanners.

Uh, what is the chain of logic that supports this suit exactly?

> 
>                                                  Jim Choate
> 
> 

--
I hate lightning - finger for public key - Vote Monarchist
unicorn@schloss.li