1996-08-29 - Re: libelous action
Header Data
From: Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>
To: Black Unicorn <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 246fd546f67778dea07470ab3c7e56430489a799c588ec24f17de380745b638e
Message ID: <v03007801ae4ae9bb0f36@[17.219.103.237]>
Reply To: <3.0b11.32.19960828165224.006a27ec@central.tansoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-29 08:47:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:47:04 +0800
Raw message
From: Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:47:04 +0800
To: Black Unicorn <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: libelous action
In-Reply-To: <3.0b11.32.19960828165224.006a27ec@central.tansoft.com>
Message-ID: <v03007801ae4ae9bb0f36@[17.219.103.237]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li> comments,
>
>I might note that the FTC is showing increased interest in cryptography
>products and the claims of their marketers.
>
Hmm, can we get FTC and NSA to fight: if NSA says that a product may be
exported, maybe FTC won't let the seller claim it is capable of protecting
data.
Intresting.
Martin Minow
minow@apple.com
Thread
Return to August 1996
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>”
- Return to ““James C. Sewell” <jims@MPGN.COM>”
Return to “Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>”
- 1996-08-29 (Thu, 29 Aug 1996 09:08:45 +0800) - Re: libelous action - “James C. Sewell” <jims@MPGN.COM>
- 1996-08-29 (Thu, 29 Aug 1996 12:37:18 +0800) - Re: libelous action - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
- 1996-08-29 (Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:47:04 +0800) - Re: libelous action - Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>