1996-08-14 - RE: National Socio-Economic Security Need for Encryption Technology

Header Data

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: “‘CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com>
Message Hash: 27ca1aa8f5249d4098ecf78e6e19dbd7a31acc84458be1dfd1690921549a8e33
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-960814184543Z-30630@RED-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-08-14 22:35:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 06:35:44 +0800

Raw message

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 06:35:44 +0800
To: "'CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com>
Subject: RE: National Socio-Economic Security Need for Encryption Technology
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-960814184543Z-30630@RED-05-IMC.itg.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From: 	Bart  Croughs
>
>You are wrong. I'm not in error; I don't think the US is worse off when US
> capital moves abroad. I just want to know how you can proof it, so I would
>be
> able to rebut protectionist arguments. I don't know how to prove it. And, 
>unfortunately, neither do you. Rhetoric is no proof.
...............................................

I said in my post:

>		"I think people who put up a lot of objections [...] 
		do not want any proof of their error."

Are you the one putting up the objections?  Are you the one who does not
want to see the proof which you are asking for?  I would think that
after having read Mises, Hayek, et al, the economic cause&effect
principles which they outlined would make the resulting situation pretty
clear.

   ..
Blanc

>	   
>
>





Thread