1996-08-12 - Re: Unmetered Net Usage

Header Data

From: “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@warwick.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 29eee6269e27e553e17df708cba7902fbce20860615f3ca7481a0478e9a79e94
Message ID: <199608121309.JAA25649@cmyk.warwick.com>
Reply To: <ae33ffaf03021004fdeb@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-12 16:38:44 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:38:44 +0800

Raw message

From: "Harry S. Hawk" <habs@warwick.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:38:44 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Unmetered Net Usage
In-Reply-To: <ae33ffaf03021004fdeb@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199608121309.JAA25649@cmyk.warwick.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



> Will "unmetered" usage go away? It depends on a lot of factors. Right now,
> unmetered usage is a big enough marketing draw that it appears to
> outcompete metered usage plans. Sure, there are people like me who pay a
> flat rate (in my case, $20/month) and yet who are on for several hours a

My view point on this is that there will always be unmetered use but
it will ALWAYS have a lower priority. That if you want to ensure that
the download your doing or the internet phone call you placing gets
through you'll have to pay it bit...

You pay for faster routing
You will pay for priority access
You will pay for transaction control and measure and monitoring..
etc..

If you don't care about those things.. and will surf on the left over
bits' i'm sure it will always be unmetered.

/hawk






Thread