From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2f0d8d8b0e3f5c8f70b0fa6d45fb988219cd9d019c379e6b41116a8386b435ac
Message ID: <199608130043.RAA02224@netcom15.netcom.com>
Reply To: <01I876465KRK9JD5RL@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 04:02:30 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:02:30 +0800
From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:02:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches
In-Reply-To: <01I876465KRK9JD5RL@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <199608130043.RAA02224@netcom15.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Color me skeptical.
"E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU> writes:
> The gadget doesn't send out X-rays; instead, it picks up
> electromagnetic waves emitted by human flesh.
Would these electromagnetic waves be something distinct from the
blackbody spectrum of a human-sized blob of "mostly water" at the
appropriate temperature?
Or to put it another way, is this just a sophisticated IR imager
thickly coated in snake oil and marketing hype?
--
Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $
Return to August 1996
Return to “mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)”