1996-08-13 - Re: “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches

Header Data

From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2f0d8d8b0e3f5c8f70b0fa6d45fb988219cd9d019c379e6b41116a8386b435ac
Message ID: <199608130043.RAA02224@netcom15.netcom.com>
Reply To: <01I876465KRK9JD5RL@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 04:02:30 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:02:30 +0800

Raw message

From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:02:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches
In-Reply-To: <01I876465KRK9JD5RL@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <199608130043.RAA02224@netcom15.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Color me skeptical.

"E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU> writes:

 > The gadget doesn't send out X-rays; instead, it picks up
 > electromagnetic waves emitted by human flesh.

Would these electromagnetic waves be something distinct from the
blackbody spectrum of a human-sized blob of "mostly water" at the
appropriate temperature?

Or to put it another way, is this just a sophisticated IR imager
thickly coated in snake oil and marketing hype?

--
     Mike Duvos         $    PGP 2.6 Public Key available     $
     mpd@netcom.com     $    via Finger.                      $







Thread