From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3073414f9eccaa73ddd096485ef4b5d5b64ccfbda5ef57563a5615210164a713
Message ID: <199608011848.LAA11828@netcom13.netcom.com>
Reply To: <ae262b5b050210046227@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-01 22:41:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 06:41:23 +0800
From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 06:41:23 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FPGAs and Heat (Re: Paranoid Musings)
In-Reply-To: <ae262b5b050210046227@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199608011848.LAA11828@netcom13.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Timothy C. May writes:
> This was a company in Bowie, Maryland, closely linked with the NSA and with
> the "supercomputer centers." The idea of "processing in memory" has been
> explored by various companies.
That's one of the things that killed Thinking Machines. It turned out
that a standard supercomputer with PIM chips for memory could give the
same performance for less money. The PIMs did the massively parallel
computation with the standard architecture redistributing data as needed
using high bandwidth scatter-gather operations and moves.
At the time Thinking Machines went under, Seymour Cray had a big contract
for Cray Computer to deliver a PIM Cray machine to the government, but he
missed some deadlines, got cancelled, and his company went down the tubes
as well. Too bad, it would have been a nice box.
BTW, I gave up trying to predict innovations after being dragged down to
see an early version of Visi-Calc running on an Apple, and horribly
insulting the developers with comments like "But why would anyone want
to emulate a ledger sheet?" and "I hope you guys didn't spend a lot of
time on this." After repeating such performances at startups like Lotus
and Infocom, I realized that predictive history was not one of my talents.
--
Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $
Return to August 1996
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”