1996-08-02 - Re: Internal Passports

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 37376a5dadaee7c4ed102aa0f994aa628133ebc9657ff3f64bf94e1e45083efc
Message ID: <v02120d18ae2769138b69@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-02 12:58:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 20:58:27 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 20:58:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Internal Passports
Message-ID: <v02120d18ae2769138b69@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 13:06 8/1/96, David M. Rose wrote:
>On 1 Aug 1996 (Timothy C. May) wrote:
>
>>I'm with Duncan and Lucky on this one. Nations with a "Privacy Ombudsman"
>>are almost always nations with extensive files on individuals, their
>>habits, and their political activities.
>>
>>Having a "Privacy Ombudsman" is a bone thrown to the proles. I suspect a
>>police state like Singapore has such a person.
>
>My understanding is that the acceptable term is "ombud", or possibly
>"ombuds".  Cf.: "chair", "anchor", "milk", "post", "g-", "colored",  "fire",
>"police", "China", "French", etc.

Ombudsman is a Swedish term. I suppose the modern day English
deconstruction/reconstruction would be ombudsperson.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November.
   Vote Harry Browne for President.







Thread