From: “Greg Kucharo” <sophi@best.com>
To: “Vincent Cate” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 3be63f32fb65cce18d9ed344b5f44f18953f7ed69195261b4d9436249fadce62
Message ID: <199608160202.TAA21122@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-16 05:04:00 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:04:00 +0800
From: "Greg Kucharo" <sophi@best.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:04:00 +0800
To: "Vincent Cate" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Anguilla - A DataHaven?
Message-ID: <199608160202.TAA21122@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
The only ideal I can think of would be the fictional "Port Watson". What
is you had a system that spanned countries, using the internet as a linking
device. It would be the same service. But when you specified the kind of
data you wanted to post, the system would route it to the appropriate
server in a country where it wasn't illegal.
----------
> From: Vincent Cate <vince@offshore.com.ai>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Anguilla - A DataHaven?
> Date: Wednesday, August 14, 1996 5:40 AM
>
>
> Tim:
> > Rather, there is an "archetype," if you will, of what a "remailer" is,
what
> > a "data haven" is, what a "tax shelter" is, etc. While we cannot
reasonably
> > expect a remailer to exactly match the archetype, we can point out
obvious
> > deficiencies.
>
> 1) Anguilla has secrecy laws. Professional relationships are
confidential.
> There are strong secrecy laws. I have not given out taxbomber's
> name, nor will I as I could face legal action if I did.
>
> 2) Anguilla has no sales or income taxes. A business does not need to
> report anything about income, sales, etc, to the government (or
anyone
> else). If a guy wants to sell his data and keep 100% of the profits
> instead of 50% or 60%, then Anguilla would be a haven for him.
>
> 3) We don't have the same laws as other countries, so there are things
> that can be done here. For example, we can export encryption
> software. Also, we will have bingo.com in Anguilla.
>
> There are deficiencies from a cypherpunk or Libertarian point of view.
And
> these are interesting. And exactly what I want to do is changing. As I
> said, Anguilla is not the datahaven of cypherpunks wet dreams. I am sure
> there are no datahavens that match the cypherpunk concept of an ideal
> datahaven, yet.
>
> But I think the term DataHaven applies as well to Anguilla as any other
> place I know of.
>
> Tim, we would all be very happy if you were to locate a country that
could
> be the site of the ideal datahaven, and finance a couple cypherpunks to
> setup there. It would be a big help to our cause. Could you do this?
>
> In the mean time, people may have to exist in cyberspace (like
> www.taxbomber.com) without having a totally secure physical location.
> This is not the end of the world, or really even that painful. If done
> right you could be down for only an hour - just long enough for
> nameservers to change. Taxbomber is now setup to do it very fast next
> time, if the need ever comes. Tim, I think you have even advocated this
> approach, not stressing the physical location, just the cyberspace
> location. No?
>
> -- Vince
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Vincent Cate vince@offshore.com.ai http://www.offshore.com.ai/vince/
> Offshore Information Services http://www.offshore.com.ai/
Return to August 1996
Return to ““Greg Kucharo” <sophi@best.com>”
1996-08-16 (Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:04:00 +0800) - Re: Anguilla - A DataHaven? - “Greg Kucharo” <sophi@best.com>