From: grad 96 <cbarnett@eciad.bc.ca>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3fb83e1e976f1ad8bb78cdf1571f5626a59e2e82b9960ddab471f9da8f9989ff
Message ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960820105924.8084A-100000@oswald>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-21 07:09:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 15:09:59 +0800
From: grad 96 <cbarnett@eciad.bc.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 15:09:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: raygun shielding
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960820105924.8084A-100000@oswald>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
not being an authority on the uses of X-Ray technology, I have no idea
how useful tinfoil or gold lamme would be for shielding. As a
professional photographer, I do know that one can purchase lead lied bags
to protectect one's film from being ruined by the X-Ray machines at the
airport. They do not work. When the customs people come to an object in
your bag that they can not see into, they turn up the power until they
can. I have ruined film and customs officer testimony to back this up,
that's why I have them do a visual inspection of my film. If you have a
lot, they don't look very hard, which has it's own bundle of opportunity
right there. Not that I am advocating that kind of behavior.
clint barnett
lord of the cosmos
emily carr institute
Return to August 1996
Return to “grad 96 <cbarnett@eciad.bc.ca>”
1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 15:09:59 +0800) - raygun shielding - grad 96 <cbarnett@eciad.bc.ca>