From: Damien Lucifer <root@HellSpawn>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4105fb763f006ed7abade7f6d600d93064dd395b061953282e63847cd7be87b0
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960829095059.6013A-100000@HellSpawn>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-29 17:00:39 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 01:00:39 +0800
From: Damien Lucifer <root@HellSpawn>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 01:00:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: List owner named in law suit (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960829095059.6013A-100000@HellSpawn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 16:52:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Clay Irving <clay@panix.com>
Subject: List owner named in law suit
I can't believe this one!
Peter Laws, a recent graduate of the University of Arkansas, maintains
an
electronic mailing list called "SCAN-L". The list is provided for
radio
scanning enthusiasts. There are a few hundred subscribers to the list.
Recently, in a thread about scanning publications, an employee of
publication
"A" apparently wrote something to offend someone at publication "B".
Lo and
behold, next thing you know, Peter is named in a lawsuit because he is
the
maintainer of the list.
Something seems very, very wrong with this. I've never heard of
anything
like this before. Can a Email list maintainer be held liable for
something
someone else writes?
Peter *just* graduated, and he needs all the help he can get. Thanks,
in
advance.
--
Clay Irving N2VKG
clay@panix.com
http://www.panix.com/~clay/
Return to August 1996
Return to “Damien Lucifer <root@HellSpawn>”
1996-08-29 (Fri, 30 Aug 1996 01:00:39 +0800) - List owner named in law suit (fwd) - Damien Lucifer <root@HellSpawn>