From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 437b0dd5aa323c46d660b66e5304fa6c4ef5393c654235d0e9a7beaf265516e8
Message ID: <v02120d0bae366adef979@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 21:58:53 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 05:58:53 +0800
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 05:58:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups
Message-ID: <v02120d0bae366adef979@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 3:01 8/13/96, David Wagner wrote:
>The *real* challenge: how do you support sender- and recipient- anonymous
>phone calls with strong security? Have fun.
Sender anonymous phone calls are easy. You route them through PipeNet,
assuming every PipeNet node has a telephony gateway. Recipient anonymous
phone calls a harder to implement.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November.
Vote Harry Browne for President.
Return to August 1996
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1996-08-13 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 05:58:53 +0800) - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)