1996-08-30 - Re: www.anonymizer.com

Header Data

From: NetSurfer <netsurf@pixi.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 48f111bff054045aab2d1cdceb57da68c4cf0863ad01ff80c9904b15da2156c6
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960830060820.3076F-100000@netsurfer>
Reply To: <199608292255.PAA08976@netcom7.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-30 19:08:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 03:08:17 +0800

Raw message

From: NetSurfer <netsurf@pixi.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 03:08:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: www.anonymizer.com
In-Reply-To: <199608292255.PAA08976@netcom7.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960830060820.3076F-100000@netsurfer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I have found and reported to the anonymizer that it does not 
always protect you against perl-based cgi scripts.  I did this by 
accessing a form-based email page (based on Matt's script) which includes 
environment variable values in the msg to the recipient.  I didn't 
receive any response back from them after I emailed them the info.

On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Bill Frantz wrote:

> www.anonymizer.com got a nice plug in David Plotnikoff's column in today's
> San Jose Mercury News.  He quotes Community ConneXion's motto, "Because on
> today's Internet, people do know you're a dog."  He also mentions its
> similarity to anonymous remailers.  His capsule review:
> 

#include <standard.disclaimer>
                    _   __     __  _____            ____
                   / | / /__  / /_/ ___/__  _______/ __/__  _____
                  /  |/ / _ \/ __/\__ \/ / / / ___/ /_/ _ \/ ___/
                 / /|  /  __/ /_ ___/ / /_/ / /  / __/  __/ /
================/_/=|_/\___/\__//____/\__,_/_/==/_/==\___/_/===============







Thread