1996-08-27 - Re: The POUCH

Header Data

From: The Prisoner <nul@void.gov>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4c55becf6ef7310498dc3ee7b7083c307186f340c4290431522b2da4f54f295a
Message ID: <32229A88.5F7E@void.gov>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960827002927.6637D-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-27 08:54:35 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 16:54:35 +0800

Raw message

From: The Prisoner <nul@void.gov>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 16:54:35 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The POUCH
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960827002927.6637D-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <32229A88.5F7E@void.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> On 26 Aug 1996, JOHN E. HOLT wrote:
> 
> > The Pouch uses a 64 x 64 block product cipher, a 1024 bit random initialization
> > vector and the CBC technique.  Most experts agree that such an implementation is highly resistant to all forms of cryptographic attack.
> > Hellman and Dilfie rely on knowing the algorithm for their known plain text attacks
> > An unpublished algorithm forces them into reverse engineering the computer
> > programs to learn the algorithm. The POUCH has many roadblocks built in
> > to prevent this.

There's another live one on sci.crypt, about "market leader" Genio USA; some good chuckles there.
Check out http://www.geniousa.com/genio/

Where's that snakeoil FAQ?  Any progress?





Thread