1996-08-29 - Re: In reference to comments made to me and to the Group

Header Data

From: “Institute for Security and Intelligence” <isi@hooked.net>
To: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Message Hash: 4dc7cc5ae71c7e0ceb9582187ef738d2aeec8ba3be42d09693e4c6f7f0c5a684
Message ID: <199608290618.XAA12301@mom.hooked.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-29 08:32:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:32:02 +0800

Raw message

From: "Institute for Security and Intelligence" <isi@hooked.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:32:02 +0800
To: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Subject: Re: In reference to comments made to me and to the Group
Message-ID: <199608290618.XAA12301@mom.hooked.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mr. Geiger:

I do not have interest in nor time for a flame war.  But I do appreciate 
your perspective, whether or not I agree.

Rather than flaming, I propose that all interested readers post their 
*CONSTRUCTIVE* ideas on the CyberTerrorism issue.  If you feel it is 
not an issue, then don't respond.  

I'm not looking for opinions on politicians, the government, etc., 
nor do  I care what you think of me or my views.  However, if you can 
put  some _solid_ thoughts into bullet items, or any other format you 
deem useful, perhaps we can move forward.

Ideas.  Actions.  No commentary, raves, rants, flames, or other bandwidth wasters.

Let's see what we come up with.

Barry C. Collin
Institute for Security and Intelligence





Thread