From: Scottauge@aol.com
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 09:26:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: cryptoanalysis 002
Message-ID: <960820183644_506047835@emout17.mail.aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I agree on expanding the symbols to represent the alphabet.

For example, if the crypto-alphabet for e is 23, 45, 190, 200, etc, one can
remove some of the frequency for a letter.  This definately makes it harder
to attack with the frequency analysis method because the "resolution" of the
distribution for the letter is lessened to a near randomness.  (So it looks,
there are still clues, eh?)