1996-08-14 - Re: National Socio-Economic Security Need for Encryption Technology

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 557e05f5670274b44844a12dc8bb1ad156e0b4c14b077a5d364f87e9eb146621
Message ID: <199608141714.NAA01978@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-960813204534Z-26547@tide19.microsoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-14 21:42:21 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 05:42:21 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 05:42:21 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: National Socio-Economic Security Need for Encryption Technology
In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-960813204534Z-26547@tide19.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <199608141714.NAA01978@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> >From: 	Bart  Croughs
> >You haven't answered this question yet. I don't claim that the U.S. is worse
> >off when US capital moves abroad. I only ask: how can you proof that the US
> >isn't worse off when US capital moves abroad? 

Simple. Keeping capital from flowing wherever it likes leads to a non-pareto
optimal state. Care to dispute that?

Perry





Thread