1996-08-13 - Re: Why should we trust the system?

Header Data

From: an681132@anon.penet.fi
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 56679120c81436c2e5907f5862fd0d8f7267ee1878c467746399d4e3ad1792ff
Message ID: <9608131321.AA13545@anon.penet.fi>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 18:33:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 02:33:13 +0800

Raw message

From: an681132@anon.penet.fi
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 02:33:13 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why should we trust the system?
Message-ID: <9608131321.AA13545@anon.penet.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>> Previously, jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>	I know of a very good way to ensure that judges do follow
>>	the standards that they claim to follow.
>>
>>	It works even better at making politicians keep all the
>>	election promises the make.
>>
>>	Has one drawback --- it reduces the number of people willing
>>	to carry out those two functions to virtually zero.  OTOH, that
>>	probably would be a very good thing.  

> Previously, jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> wrote:
> That's odd...I know of one also!    B^)

Ok, please clue in the clueless.

--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--***ATTENTION***
Your e-mail reply to this message WILL be *automatically* ANONYMIZED.
Please, report inappropriate use to                abuse@anon.penet.fi
For information (incl. non-anon reply) write to    help@anon.penet.fi
If you have any problems, address them to          admin@anon.penet.fi





Thread