From: an681132@anon.penet.fi
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 56679120c81436c2e5907f5862fd0d8f7267ee1878c467746399d4e3ad1792ff
Message ID: <9608131321.AA13545@anon.penet.fi>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 18:33:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 02:33:13 +0800
From: an681132@anon.penet.fi
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 02:33:13 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why should we trust the system?
Message-ID: <9608131321.AA13545@anon.penet.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>> Previously, jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> I know of a very good way to ensure that judges do follow
>> the standards that they claim to follow.
>>
>> It works even better at making politicians keep all the
>> election promises the make.
>>
>> Has one drawback --- it reduces the number of people willing
>> to carry out those two functions to virtually zero. OTOH, that
>> probably would be a very good thing.
> Previously, jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> wrote:
> That's odd...I know of one also! B^)
Ok, please clue in the clueless.
--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--***ATTENTION***
Your e-mail reply to this message WILL be *automatically* ANONYMIZED.
Please, report inappropriate use to abuse@anon.penet.fi
For information (incl. non-anon reply) write to help@anon.penet.fi
If you have any problems, address them to admin@anon.penet.fi
Return to August 1996
Return to “an681132@anon.penet.fi”
1996-08-13 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 02:33:13 +0800) - Re: Why should we trust the system? - an681132@anon.penet.fi